DEMOCRAT SUBMITS BILL TO RE-INSTATE MILITARY DRAFT, WITH AN AMENDMENT TO REQUIRE THE DRAFT FOR BOTH MEN AND WOMEN ! ! ! ! !

My heart aches for my six nieces and my youngest brother's wife and my cousins daughters, etc. ! ! ! ! !

Remember how the Democrats said they are now "Bi-Partisan"?
The "Bi" is like bi-sexual. The Democrats are now politically 'jumping in bed' with anyone.

Please read this carefully:
Go to http://thomas.loc.gov
<a href="http://thomas.loc.gov">; Library of Congress, Government Documents </a>
and see
'Search Bill Text'
and under that is the search box,
and under that
un-click 'Word/Phrase'
and click 'Bill Number'
and then up in the search box, write
H.R. 393

H.R. 393 Universal National Service Act
of 2007

"to require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service"...
"SEC. 111. Registration of females under the military Selective Service Act....by striking 'male' and inserting 'person'..."

Notice to students, it appears the Bill, H.R. 393, says "all persons in the United States between the ages of 28 to 42 to perform national service";
so does that mean that you wil be required to perform national service if you are a visiting college student and not a citizen of the United States?

Please contact everyone you know about this and discuss how to squash this bill like a bug.

I realize that Vermont is proud of its Gay traditions and Civil Unions, but politics shouldn't imitate bi-sexual relationships. I am deeply opposed to this "Bi-Partisan" attitude that our elected representatives have adopted making them think they can politically get in bed with anyone. The voting ballot did not say, "Bi-Partisan" as a political affiliation.

Author: Cris Ericson
<a href="http://2008winner.com">; 2008 WINNER.COM </a>